#Screen terminal emulator mac binary code
#Screen terminal emulator mac binary professional

well that's just like, your opinion, man. To suggest that opinions are somehow less valuable than yet another implementation of a terminal emulator written in a bloated framework based on a language that was designed in 11 days just to animate web page elements - and that people should reinvent the wheel or shut up. That's not to say people shouldn't try as there are many reasons to do so. What terminal emulator problem will be solved that hasn't already been solved by urxvt, KiTTY, Serial, or any of the other Electron based terminals like Magnesium or Hyper? Terminal emulators are an already solved problem. If that's not something people want, then they shouldn't be here.ДЄs for making something better. HN is a place where plenty of people provide opinions whether others like it or not. If people don't want feedback, then they shouldn't post on HN.

Thankfully they are able to contribute something much more valuable: opinions. > Because nothing is stopping them from writing something they like better, except off course skill, attitude and discipline. Designers that work with photoshop would rarely need git, which is kinda out of its element with binary data

#Screen terminal emulator mac binary code

Anything that helps discoverability could be useful.ДЄnd, for what it's worth, designers that work with code usually don't have problems with git. The shell is essentially a REPL, but most people forgo most of its potential because the language isn't core to our work, and somewhat hideous.

#Screen terminal emulator mac binary professional

Even the most professional 10x developer will spend a significant amount of his time with such commands, making this feedback useful I'd say I need to look up any option flags or commands I use less than 15x/week But it's not an ironclad rule, and it shouldn't be trotted out as an argument anytime someone tries to improve existing tools. It's obviously rooted in some instances where it is/was correct, such as the superior typesetting of LaTeX vs Word for academic work. I see this attitude all the time, namely the idea that difficulty is somehow proof of quality, or 'professionalism' of a tool.